ASEAN Navigates Philippines' South China Sea Actions

Mas Hadi Digital Media

You need 6 min read

·

Post on Nov 16, 2024

52 visitor like this post

Share

ASEAN Navigates Philippines' South China Sea Actions: A Complex Balancing Act

The South China Sea (SCS) remains a crucible of geopolitical tension, with the Philippines playing a pivotal role due to its proximity to contested features and its assertive stance on maritime rights. ASEAN, as a regional bloc, finds itself navigating a complex web of competing interests and diplomatic pressures as it seeks to manage the escalating situation. This article delves into the intricacies of the Philippines' actions in the SCS, the challenges they pose to ASEAN, and the strategies the association employs to maintain regional stability and uphold international law.

The Philippines' Assertive Stance: A Balancing Act

The Philippines, under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., continues to assert its sovereign rights within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) as defined by the 2016 arbitral ruling that invalidated China's expansive claims in the SCS. This stance, while firm, is tempered by a desire to maintain a functional relationship with China, a major trading partner and source of investment. This delicate balancing act shapes the country's actions in the SCS.

Key Actions of the Philippines:

• Legal Recourse: The Philippines' consistent referencing of the 2016 arbitral ruling serves as a cornerstone of its SCS policy. This unwavering commitment to international law provides a strong legal basis for its claims and counters China's disregard for the ruling.
• Strengthening Military Alliances: The Philippines has deepened its military cooperation with the United States, enhancing its defense capabilities and deterring potential aggression. Joint military exercises and the expansion of US military presence in the region signify a strengthened security posture. This alliance acts as a significant counterweight to China's growing influence.
• Diplomatic Engagement: While asserting its rights, the Philippines also maintains diplomatic channels with China. This approach involves bilateral talks aimed at managing disagreements and preventing escalation. However, this engagement is not without its limitations, given China's persistent disregard for the arbitral ruling.
• Enhanced Maritime Domain Awareness: The Philippines is investing in improving its maritime surveillance capabilities. This includes upgrading its naval assets and strengthening its coast guard to better monitor activity in its EEZ and protect its fishing rights. This enhanced awareness is crucial for effectively responding to incursions and illegal activities.
• International Collaboration: Beyond its bilateral relationships, the Philippines actively engages with other ASEAN members and international partners to promote a rules-based order in the SCS. This collaborative approach aims to garner support for the arbitral ruling and uphold international law.

ASEAN's Response: Navigating a Minefield of Interests

ASEAN’s approach to the Philippines' actions in the SCS is characterized by a cautious balancing act. The association seeks to maintain regional stability while avoiding direct confrontation with China, its largest trading partner. This delicate balancing necessitates a nuanced strategy, fraught with both opportunities and challenges.

ASEAN's Challenges:

• Differing National Interests: ASEAN members hold varied perspectives on the SCS issue, shaped by their individual relationships with China and their own claims in the region. This divergence of interests complicates the formulation of a unified ASEAN response.
• China's Influence: China's economic clout and its growing military power exert considerable influence over ASEAN members, often dissuading them from taking strong collective action against China's actions.
• Maintaining Unity: ASEAN's principle of non-interference in internal affairs limits its ability to directly criticize individual members' actions, even when those actions challenge regional stability. This constraint requires a careful diplomatic dance to address sensitive issues without jeopardizing regional unity.
• Limited Enforcement Mechanisms: ASEAN lacks effective mechanisms to enforce its decisions and declarations regarding the SCS. This weakness undermines its ability to translate its pronouncements into tangible outcomes and deter aggressive actions.

ASEAN's Strategies:

• The ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP): This framework provides a broad strategic vision for the region, emphasizing a rules-based order and peaceful resolution of disputes. The AOIP serves as a guiding document for ASEAN's engagement with SCS issues, even if its implementation faces obstacles.
• Code of Conduct (COC) Negotiations: The ongoing negotiations for a COC in the SCS represent a crucial ASEAN effort to manage disputes and establish a framework for peaceful coexistence. However, the pace of these negotiations is slow, and the final agreement's effectiveness remains uncertain.
• Strengthening Maritime Cooperation: ASEAN is promoting maritime cooperation among its members, including joint patrols and information sharing. This approach aims to enhance regional maritime security and bolster the collective capacity to address illegal activities in the SCS.
• Promoting Dialogue and Diplomacy: ASEAN continues to encourage dialogue and diplomatic engagement between claimant states, advocating for peaceful resolution of disputes through negotiations and adherence to international law. This approach recognizes that diplomacy is essential, despite its limitations.

The Path Forward: Upholding International Law and Regional Stability

The Philippines' assertive stance in the SCS, while creating challenges for ASEAN, also presents opportunities to strengthen the association's commitment to a rules-based regional order. The path forward requires a multifaceted approach involving several key elements:

• Sustained Diplomatic Pressure: ASEAN must maintain consistent diplomatic pressure on China to comply with international law and the 2016 arbitral ruling. This requires a united front, despite the diverse interests of individual members.
• Strengthening ASEAN's Institutional Capacity: ASEAN needs to enhance its institutional capacity to monitor and respond to incidents in the SCS. This involves strengthening its maritime security cooperation and developing effective enforcement mechanisms.
• Increased International Collaboration: ASEAN should actively collaborate with extra-regional partners who share its commitment to a rules-based order, such as the US, Japan, Australia, and the European Union. This cooperation can provide crucial support in addressing China's actions.
• Promoting Economic Cooperation: While security concerns are paramount, ASEAN should also focus on strengthening economic cooperation among its members and with its partners. A prosperous and integrated region is better equipped to withstand geopolitical pressures.
• Focusing on People-to-People Exchanges: Strengthening people-to-people exchanges among ASEAN countries and even with China can help foster understanding and build trust. This approach can contribute to a more peaceful and cooperative regional environment.

The situation in the SCS remains fluid and dynamic. ASEAN’s ability to effectively navigate the complexities of the Philippines' actions, while balancing its own interests and those of its diverse members, will be crucial in determining the future stability and prosperity of the region. The path forward requires a delicate blend of diplomatic engagement, assertive defense of international law, and a concerted effort to strengthen ASEAN’s capacity to maintain regional peace and security. The success of this endeavor will have significant implications not only for the SCS but for the broader Indo-Pacific region and the global order.