Manila's South China Sea Policy Faces ASEAN Scrutiny

Mas Hadi Digital Media

You need 5 min read

·

Post on Nov 16, 2024

52 visitor like this post

Share

Manila's South China Sea Policy Faces ASEAN Scrutiny: A Balancing Act Between Sovereignty and Regional Harmony

The South China Sea (SCS) remains a crucible of geopolitical tension, with the Philippines, a key player in the region, navigating a complex web of competing interests. Manila's South China Sea policy, characterized by a delicate balancing act between asserting its sovereign rights and maintaining regional stability within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) framework, is facing increasing scrutiny. This scrutiny stems from both internal pressures and the evolving geopolitical landscape, forcing the Philippines to recalibrate its approach.

Navigating the Complexities of the Nine-Dash Line

The core of the issue lies in China's expansive claim to almost the entirety of the SCS, based on its controversial nine-dash line. This claim overlaps significantly with the Philippines' Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), encompassing crucial fishing grounds and potentially lucrative hydrocarbon reserves. The 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling, which invalidated China's nine-dash line claim, provided a legal basis for the Philippines' claims, but it hasn't deterred China's assertive actions. Manila's challenge lies in effectively enforcing its sovereign rights while avoiding direct confrontation with a significantly more powerful neighbor.

The Duterte Era and the Pivot Towards China

Under the administration of President Rodrigo Duterte, the Philippines adopted a more conciliatory approach towards China, prioritizing economic ties over outright confrontation. This pivot, widely seen as prioritizing economic benefits over asserting territorial rights, sparked considerable debate both domestically and internationally. Critics argued that the Duterte administration's approach compromised the Philippines' sovereignty and undermined the 2016 arbitral ruling. Supporters, however, highlighted the economic benefits derived from increased Chinese investment and trade.

This shift in policy resulted in a perceived reluctance to actively challenge China's actions in the SCS, leading to concerns among ASEAN members and international partners about the weakening of regional norms and the rule of law. The relative silence on China's aggressive activities, including the building of artificial islands and the harassment of Filipino fishermen, fueled criticism. The legacy of this period continues to shape the current discourse and necessitates a clear articulation of the Philippines’ future SCS policy.

The Marcos Administration: A Reassessment of the Balancing Act

The election of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. presented an opportunity to reassess the Philippines' approach to the SCS. While maintaining a commitment to peaceful relations with China, the Marcos administration has signaled a shift towards a more assertive stance. This is evidenced by increased diplomatic efforts to reaffirm the 2016 arbitral ruling and stronger condemnation of China's actions. The renewed emphasis on strengthening alliances with the United States and other regional partners further underscores this recalibration.

However, this assertive stance must navigate the complexities of the regional dynamic. ASEAN's principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of its member states presents a challenge in coordinating a unified response to China's actions. The Philippines, therefore, walks a tightrope: pushing back against China's assertiveness while simultaneously working within the ASEAN framework to maintain regional stability.

Economic Considerations and Regional Cooperation

The economic dimension cannot be overlooked. China's economic influence in the region is undeniable, and the Philippines benefits from trade and investment partnerships. However, over-reliance on China could make the Philippines vulnerable to economic coercion. Finding a balance between economic benefits and strategic autonomy remains a crucial element of Manila's SCS policy.

ASEAN's role is paramount. The Code of Conduct (COC) negotiations, aimed at establishing a legally binding framework for managing disputes in the SCS, have been ongoing for years. The Philippines' active participation and contribution to these negotiations are crucial in shaping a regional mechanism that respects the rule of law and upholds the sovereignty of all claimant states. The effectiveness of ASEAN's collective response to China's actions will determine the extent to which regional norms can prevail over unilateral assertions of power.

Strengthening Alliances and International Partnerships

The Marcos administration's renewed emphasis on strengthening alliances, particularly with the United States, Japan, Australia, and other like-minded countries, provides a counterbalance to China's growing influence. These partnerships not only enhance the Philippines' military capabilities but also provide diplomatic support and bolster its position in negotiations. This multilateral approach is vital in countering China's unilateral actions and ensuring a more equitable and rules-based order in the SCS.

Domestic Politics and Public Opinion

The Philippine public's perception of China's actions in the SCS significantly influences domestic political dynamics. Balancing the need for economic cooperation with the safeguarding of national sovereignty requires careful navigation of public opinion. Effective communication and transparency are crucial in maintaining public support for the government's SCS policy.

Challenges and Future Prospects

The challenges facing Manila’s South China Sea policy are substantial. Maintaining a delicate balance between asserting sovereignty, securing economic benefits, and promoting regional stability requires strategic acumen and diplomatic dexterity. The success of the Philippines' approach will depend on its ability to:

• Effectively leverage the 2016 arbitral ruling: Sustained diplomatic pressure based on international law is essential.
• Strengthen alliances and partnerships: Collaboration with like-minded countries enhances the Philippines' bargaining power.
• Promote a robust and effective Code of Conduct: A strong COC is crucial for managing disputes and ensuring peaceful resolution.
• Maintain a balanced approach to China: Prioritizing economic cooperation without compromising sovereignty is key.
• Engage effectively with domestic stakeholders: Transparency and clear communication are essential for maintaining public support.

The future of the South China Sea hinges on the collective commitment of regional states to uphold international law and resolve disputes peacefully. The Philippines, as a pivotal ASEAN member, plays a crucial role in shaping this future. Its ability to navigate the complexities of this multifaceted issue will determine not only its own destiny but also the trajectory of regional peace and stability. The scrutiny faced by Manila's South China Sea policy serves as a reminder of the vital importance of upholding international law, fostering regional cooperation, and safeguarding national sovereignty in this crucial area.