Philippines Politics: Marcos Vs Duterte

Mas Hadi Digital Media

You need 6 min read

·

Post on Nov 30, 2024

39 visitor like this post

Share

Philippines Politics: A Deep Dive into the Marcos and Duterte Eras

The Philippines has a rich and often turbulent political history. Two names dominate recent discourse: Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr., the current president, and Rodrigo Duterte, his predecessor. Understanding the Philippines' current political landscape requires examining the legacies and contrasting styles of these two powerful figures. This article delves into the intricacies of their presidencies, comparing their approaches to governance, their impacts on society, and the enduring effects on Philippine politics.

The Marcos Jr. Presidency: Continuity and Change

Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.'s victory in the 2022 presidential election marked a significant turning point in Philippine politics. His win, a landslide victory, was seen by many as a resurgence of the Marcos family's influence, a family synonymous with both authoritarian rule and economic development during the late 20th century. This legacy casts a long shadow over his administration.

Economic Policies: A Focus on Infrastructure and Growth

Marcos Jr.'s administration has prioritized economic growth, focusing heavily on infrastructure development under the "Build Better More" program. This ambitious plan aims to modernize the country's infrastructure, mirroring some aspects of Duterte's "Build, Build, Build" initiative. While this focus on infrastructure is widely seen as necessary for economic progress, concerns remain regarding transparency, debt sustainability, and the potential displacement of communities affected by large-scale projects. Sustainable economic growth remains a key challenge, demanding careful balancing of infrastructure investment with social equity and environmental protection.

Social Issues: A Conservative Turn?

On social issues, the Marcos Jr. administration has adopted a more conservative stance compared to some of its predecessors. This shift is evident in its approach to issues such as reproductive health and LGBTQ+ rights. While avoiding overt crackdowns, the administration's emphasis on traditional values has raised concerns among advocacy groups. The ongoing debate surrounding these social issues highlights a key tension within Philippine society: the clash between progressive ideals and deeply rooted conservative traditions. Balancing social progress with cultural sensitivity is a critical aspect of his governance that continues to shape political discourse.

Foreign Policy: Navigating Global Alliances

In foreign policy, Marcos Jr. has pursued a more independent and balanced approach, seeking to strengthen ties with both the United States and China. This strategy reflects a pragmatic approach to navigating the complex geopolitical landscape of the Asia-Pacific region. However, maintaining a delicate balance between these major powers presents significant challenges, requiring careful diplomacy and strategic maneuvering. The strengthening of alliances with traditional partners alongside the pursuit of better relations with China constitutes a key feature of his foreign policy agenda.

The Duterte Presidency: Populism and Strongman Rule

Rodrigo Duterte's presidency (2016-2022) was defined by its populist appeal, strongman leadership, and controversial "war on drugs." His presidency brought about significant shifts in Philippine politics, leaving a complex and contested legacy.

The "War on Drugs": A Legacy of Violence and Controversy

Duterte's signature policy was his relentless "war on drugs," a campaign characterized by widespread extrajudicial killings and human rights abuses. This campaign garnered both domestic support and international condemnation, raising serious concerns about the rule of law and the protection of human rights. The human cost of the "war on drugs" remains a highly contentious issue, impacting the nation's human rights record and fueling ongoing debates about accountability.

Economic Policies: Infrastructure and the Rise of China

Duterte also implemented ambitious infrastructure projects under his "Build, Build, Build" program, aiming to modernize the country's infrastructure and stimulate economic growth. While this initiative achieved some success, questions persist about the transparency and efficiency of project implementation. His administration also fostered closer ties with China, leading to increased Chinese investment in infrastructure and other sectors, but also raising concerns about potential debt burdens and geopolitical implications. Balancing economic growth with national sovereignty proved to be a significant challenge under Duterte’s leadership.

Social Policies: A Blend of Populism and Authoritarianism

Duterte's populism resonated with many Filipinos, particularly those who felt marginalized or neglected by previous administrations. His tough stance on crime and corruption appealed to a public weary of inefficiency and lawlessness. However, his administration also exhibited authoritarian tendencies, including attacks on critics, suppression of dissent, and undermining of democratic institutions. The tension between populism and authoritarianism remains a crucial aspect of understanding the Duterte era.

Comparing Marcos Jr. and Duterte: Similarities and Differences

While both Marcos Jr. and Duterte have employed populist rhetoric and prioritized infrastructure development, significant differences exist in their styles and approaches. Duterte's leadership was characterized by its raw populism, strongman persona, and controversial policies. Marcos Jr., while leveraging his family's legacy, has adopted a more measured and calculated approach. However, both administrations have faced criticism regarding human rights, transparency, and the concentration of power.

Leadership Styles: Populism and Pragmatism

Duterte’s leadership was defined by its strongman style, characterized by direct address, controversial rhetoric, and a disregard for conventional political norms. Marcos Jr., on the other hand, has adopted a more measured and pragmatic approach, engaging in more traditional political maneuvers. While both are populist in their appeal, their methods of achieving their goals differ significantly. Understanding the different styles of populism in the Philippines is critical in analyzing the political landscape.

Economic Strategies: Infrastructure and Beyond

Both administrations emphasized infrastructure development as a key economic policy. However, their approaches differ in scope and implementation. Duterte's "Build, Build, Build" aimed for a broad range of projects, while Marcos Jr.'s "Build Better More" focuses on strategic and sustainable development. The long-term effects of these infrastructure projects on the Philippine economy remain to be seen.

Human Rights and the Rule of Law

Both administrations have faced significant criticism regarding human rights and the rule of law. Duterte's "war on drugs" was infamous for its human rights abuses, while Marcos Jr.'s administration faces challenges related to transparency and accountability. Addressing human rights concerns remains a critical issue in both eras and impacts the international perception of the Philippines.

Conclusion: The Enduring Impact

The presidencies of Marcos Jr. and Duterte represent distinct yet interconnected phases in Philippine political history. While Duterte’s era was marked by a controversial war on drugs and strongman leadership, Marcos Jr.’s administration is characterized by a more pragmatic but similarly populist approach. The enduring impact of both leaders' legacies on Philippine politics, society, and the economy will continue to unfold for years to come. Understanding the complexities of these presidencies is crucial for comprehending the current state and future trajectory of the Philippines. The challenges faced by both leaders highlight the enduring complexities of Philippine politics, including the tension between economic development and social justice, the relationship between populism and authoritarianism, and the critical need for transparency and accountability in government. The ongoing conversations surrounding these issues will continue to shape the political landscape of the Philippines for generations to come.